April 14, 2004
POLITICS: Downside of A Smear
Via Kaus, we find this LA Times report (registration required), which just cracked me up:
[M]ost Americans recoil from efforts to blame Bush for the [September 11] attacks. One leading Democratic interest group recently asked a focus group in Florida to respond to a potential television ad accusing Bush of negligence in failing to stop the attacks. The result was volcanic — against the ad.
"They were so angry I thought they were going to turn the tables over," said a Democratic operative who watched the session. "It was a very polarizing ad, and it pushed people who were on the fence decidedly away from us."
At leaast the Dems stopped it before it got on air! Unlike a certain ad with a flag-drapped stretcher being removed from Ground zero.
Sorry, not the same thing; not close. Pointing to September 11 as an epochal event that's a key campaign issue, and running on your own response to the event: OK. Making a thoroughly bogus charge that the other guys is to blame: not OK.
Questioning Bush's response to 9/11 OK.
Blaming him for 9/11 not OK.
Referencing the War on terror and images from 9/11 OK.
Using the image of a flag covered stretcher not OK.