Baseball Crank
Covering the Front and Back Pages of the Newspaper
November 6, 2004
POLITICS: The Insincerest Form Of Criticism

Instapundit links to a post-election item from one of the Daily Kos contributors containing this charming bit:

Marching order #1, therefore, is this: No matter whom you talk to outside our circles, begin to perpetuate the (false, exaggerated) notion that George Bush's victory was built not merely on values issues, but gay marriage specifically. If you feel a need to broaden it slightly, try depicting the GOP as a majority party synonymous with gay-haters, warmongers and country-clubbers. Because I, for one, am tired of hearing whiny complaints from conservatives that, not only do I not have values, but that I fail to properly respect the values of people who are all too happy to buy into, no less perpetuate, inaccurate caricatures of the 54+ million Americans who voted Tuesday for John Kerry.

Criticizing the GOP ain't gonna build us a new national majority. But the process is brick by brick, or perhaps, brickbat by brickbat. We didn't decide the rules of engagement, but that's what they are and so we may as well start firing away.

I have heard this attitude many times, and it always seems to come from the Left. Not from everyone, mind you, but the people it does come from . . . let's back up a bit here: we all know that many people on the Right and on the Left regard some or all of the other side as liars, cheaters, etc. in their conduct of elections and political debate. Leaving aside for the sake of argument who's right about this and in what ways, it can be very frustrating to fight against people you regard as fighting dirty and cheating.

I've read or been party to plenty of bitter wallows after election defeats, from widespread debacles in 1989, 1990, 1992, 1996 and 1998 to more localized issues like Hillary Clinton's senate win in 2000. I've seen plenty of examples of conservatives looking for ways to stop lies, election fraud and other sorts of wrongdoing by Democrats. I've seen conservatives willing to hoist Democrats by their own petards, most notably with the Independent Counsel statute and with he-said-she-said sexual harrassment claims (Paula Jones as revenge for Anita Hill). And yes, I've seen conservatives argue points that were just not true.

But I have never seen anybody on the Right argue that we ought to knowingly spread untruths or create false impressions to win political arguments. What's disturbing about a lot of the reactions from people in the Left's fever swamps and sometimes even in more mainstream venues is the notion that Democrats ought to imitate precisely those facets of Republican tactics that they profess to find offensive. What's particularly damaging is the desire to imitate the GOP without really understanding why Republicans do the things we do and why they are effective, which is how you get what amounts to cargo-cult operations like Media Matters, which purports to be a complement to conservative outlets that decry media bias but instead spends most of its time just taking potshots at conservative pundits.

Posted by Baseball Crank at 11:49 PM | Politics 2004 | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Comments

Well, that sounds like a losing strategy to me.

Then again, some people HAVE made that argument about the Right and, in some individual cases, Iím sure itís warranted. This pre-election Joshua Green hit piece in The Atlantic essentially argues as much about Karl Rove:

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200411/green

How much of that is accurate? Iím not sure, although the tone of the article made me deeply skeptical of some of the examples.

Posted by: The Mad Hibernian at November 7, 2004 11:19 AM

"But I have never seen anybody on the Right argue that we ought to knowingly spread untruths or create false impressions to win political arguments..."

Nah, vince foster, whitewater, swift boats.....

That quote is so sad and silly that Richard Mellon Scaife is laughing

Posted by: Really at November 7, 2004 7:59 PM

You miss my point entirely. It's bad enough when people on one side or the other do things like that, but what's so deeply disturbing is to see some voices being raised on the Left to defend openly the idea of spreading falsehoods. That's a dangerous next step to take.

Posted by: Crank at November 7, 2004 8:57 PM

You miss my point entirely. The right has continued to spread such vicious calumny over the years it has created a force that will consume more moderate elements. Witness specter's current problems. As the jacobins learned, what's good for the goose...

It's typical right-wing hooie to try to pass the blame off on Dems. All those years when GOP was silent in the face of the outright liesof Limbaugh and his ilk consituted an outright tacit acceptance of these lies that had the force of complicity.

Kos is just a blogger rather than a broadcast host with tens of millions of listeners or, as in Fox News' case, viewers (although Fox cannot be compared outright with Limbaugh, it has certanly degraded standards. But , what the hey, do you still take comfort from the NY Post?) Still, Kos'is tack to a limited readership is more honest in its propogandizing, and, certainly, has more merit to its claim than the repulsive Atwaterian, Rovian and freeper crap that will forever stain any sought after legitimacy of modern GOP.

Hell, we both have a good guess at what won this election

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1105-27.htm

A lot to be proud of. Oh, I forgot, you guys now have to put on the caring mask. Just like Rudy, after the Feds started getting on his case the years before 9/11. Didn't work too well then, either,if you remember.

Posted by: Really at November 8, 2004 1:38 AM
Site Meter 250wde_2004WeblogAwards_BestSports.jpg