![]()
"You gotta believe!"
"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong."
"Luck is the residue of design."
Categories
Baseball 2002-03 (566)
Baseball 2004 (372) Baseball 2005 (291) Baseball 2006 (361) Baseball 2007 (261) Baseball 2008 (260) Baseball 2009 (167) Baseball 2010 (102) Baseball 2011 (51) Baseball 2012-Present (47) Baseball Columns (94) Baseball Studies (106) Basketball (86) Blog 2002-05 (372) Blog 2006-Present (234) Business (90) Enemies of Science (13) Football (99) History (132) Hurricane Katrina (36) In Print (14) Kiner's Korner (6) Law 2002-04 (229) Law 2005 (106) Law 2006-08 (186) Law 2009-Present (122) Other Sports (36) Patriot Games (10) Podcasts and Media (2) Politics 2002-03 (492) Politics 2004 (446) Politics 2005 (129) Politics 2006 (125) Politics 2007 (84) Politics 2008 (491) Politics 2009 (223) Politics 2010 (103) Politics 2011 (39) Politics 2012 (110) Politics 2013 (30) Politics 2014 (34) Politics 2015 (23) Politics 2016 (166) Politics 2017 (59) Politics 2018 (3) Poll Analysis (106) Pop Culture (345) Religion (68) Science (81) War 2002-03 (550) War 2004 (194) War 2005 (116) War 2006 (122) War 2007-Present (267) Writings Elsewhere (217) Contact
Email me at my Twitter handle at gmail dot com
Stat Reports
Greatest Hits
My September 11 Story (9/14/01)
Baseball Blog Posts
Baseball's Most Impressive Records
Changing Pitcher Workloads 1920-2004 A History of Team Defense, 1871-2011 2003 Red Sox and the All-Time Great Slugging Teams All-Time Great OBP Teams Barry Bonds' Unique Aging Pattern Hall of Fame Outfielders, 1920s-1930s Grover Cleveland Alexander vs. Bob Gibson The All-Time Greatest Stretch Runs 1928 AL Pennant Race 1993-94 Expos Revisited Relief Pitchers After Catastrophic Postseason Losses A Brief History of Lefthanded Pitching Bill James, Sabermetrics, Conservatives, and Bloggers Non-Baseball Blog Posts
The Horrible 2008 Farm Bill
Federalism's Edge The Star Wars Prequels As They Should Have Been Obama Administration Survival Guide Sun Tzu and the Art of Judicial Nominations Bush, Kerry, Dean and the Importance of Principled Positions The Integrity Gap: Barack Obama The Integrity Gap: Sarah Palin Why You Can't Negotiate About Terrorism The One Essential Requirement For Military Intervention America's Credibility On Federalizing The Minimum Wage Bruce Springsteen & the Right Cross-Blog Iraq Debate (Feb 2003) The Goalposts: Defining Victory in Iraq (June 2004) A Close Look At The Commerce Department's Budget How a Social Moderate Could Win The 2008 GOP Nomination George W. Bush: Reform Conservative or Neoliberal? State of Rock & Pop 2009-2010 Writings Elsewhere
Giving Thomas His Due (Weekly Standard 7/20/15)
The Economic Case Against The DH (Grantland 7/12/11) NY GOP: Gang That Can't Vote Straight (NY Post 9/17/10) The Path to Cooperstown: The Third Basemen (Hardball Times 4/8/10) The Path to Cooperstown: The Catchers, Part II (Hardball Times 2/10/09) The Path to Cooperstown: The Catchers, Part I (Hardball Times 1/30/09) The Path to Cooperstown: Tim Raines and the Tablesetters (Hardball Times 12/27/07) 2008 Hall of Fame Roundtable: Yes on Gossage, No on Dawson (Armchair GM, 12/12/07) The Path to Cooperstown Through the Middle Infield (Hardball Times 1/9/07) Scandalology (Weekly Standard 2/1/06) Rice, Belle, and Dawson in Context (Hardball Times 1/31/06) Blogometer Interview (National Journal 1/26/06) Casey's Yankees Revisited: Pitching, Defense, And Balls in Play (Baseball Primer 3/26/03) The Simple Solution to Economic Disparities in Baseball (Baseball Primer 3/5/02) Search
Selected Columns
Baseball's Underappreciated Great Teams, 1970s-90s (Projo 2/28/03)
Baseball's Underappreciated Great Teams, 1950s-1960s (Projo 2/14/03) Baseball's Underappreciated Great Teams, 1900s-1940s (Projo 1/23/03) 2003 Hall of Fame Ballot (Projo 1/10/03) Fernandomania! (Projo 10/25/02) Lessons From The 2002 World Series Teams (Projo 10/21/02) 1916-17 Giants (Projo 10/4/02) 1914-15 Giants (Projo 9/20/02) 2002: The Year Of The Bullpen (Projo 9/6/02) Baseball Mom (Projo 8/25/02) Gay Ballplayers And Steroids In Baseball (Projo 5/31/02) Jose Canseco and the Dick Allen Problem (Projo 5/14/02) The Path To 300 Wins (Projo 4/23/02) Hating Barry Bonds, Scoring Rey Ordonez and the 1962 MVP Race (Projo 8/31/01) The Best-Hitting Catchers Ever (Projo 8/10/01) The 2001 Mariners at the Midpoint (Projo 7/20/01) The End of an Era at Shea (Boston Sports Guy 5/15/01) Ichiro the Throwback (Boston Sports Guy 5/2/01) Clemente and Musial (Boston Sports Guy 4/8/01) Remembering Eddie Mathews (Boston Sports Guy 3/2/01) In Defense of the Bandwagon (Boston Sports Guy 2/3/01) Hall of Fame: Blyleven, Morris, Kaat, John, & Tiant (Boston Sports Guy 1/11/01) Hall of Fame: Gossage, Sutter & Other Relievers (Boston Sports Guy 1/14/01) Hall of Fame: Murphy, Rice and Puckett (Boston Sports Guy 12/29/00) Hall of Fame: Whitaker, Concepcion and Parker (Boston Sports Guy 12/22/00) Hall of Fame: Carter, Parrish, Hernandez, Mattingly and Garvey (Boston Sports Guy 12/15/00) Subway Series Diary Part II (Boston Sports Guy 12/7/00) Subway Series Diary Part I (Boston Sports Guy 11/31/00) Hall of Fame: Perez, Rice and Carter (Boston Sports Guy 8/11/00) Hall of Fame: Bid McPhee (Boston Sports Guy 8/11/00) Remembering 1986 (Boston Sports Guy 7/13/00) Shoeless Joe and Charlie Hustle (Boston Sports Guy 6/16/00) Frank Sullivan (Boston Sports Guy 5/10/00) Down With The One-Out Specialists (Boston Sports Guy 5/5/00) Calendar
Archives
March 2018
February 2018 January 2018 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 February 2000 October 1999 July 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 September 1998 July 1998 December 1990 Reference Desk
George Orwell on Politics and the English Language
Steven Den Beste's 2003 Strategic Overview of the War on Terror Bill James' Lessons From The Baseball Abstracts What is 'Sabermetrics'? What are Established Win Shares Levels? What are Defense-Independent Pitching Stats? What are Translated Pitching Stats? What is 'The Ewing Theory'? What, really, are the big and small markets for baseball? What is a 'Chickenhawk'? Ye OIde Blogroll
Baseball Blogs
David Pinto's Baseball Musings (Instapundit of the baseball bloggers)
Joe Posnanski John Sickels' Minor League Ball The Hardball Times (Group site featuring leading baseball bloggers) Matthew Cerrone's MetsBlog Amazin' Avenue (Mets Blog) Aaron's Baseball Blog (General interest; Twins Fan) Al's Ramblings (Brew Crew Fan) Athletics Nation U.S.S. Mariner Rays Index (TB Fans) Mets Geek (Mets Group Blog) The Eddie Kranepool Society (Mets Blog) Bob Sikes, Getting Paid to Watch Rich Lederer's Baseball Analysts (archive only since 2012) Baseball Links
BaseballReference.com
Baseball Prospectus (Includes premium content that's worth the cost) Retrosheet - Box Scores & Daily Standings back to 1900 Bill James Online ($) Hardball Times Stats Page Hardball Times 2004 Stats Page (Includes 2004 Win Shares) 2003 Win Shares 2002 Win Shares Minor League Team Pages (Links to Current Minor League Stats) Baseball Cube (Career Minor League Stats) Click here for WhatIfSports!(Warning, this site may be addictive!) The Hall of Fame SABR (Society for American Baseball Research) TangoTiger's Baseball Stat Analysis Page Pinto's Day by Day Batter Comparisons Pinto's Day by Day Pitcher Comparisons Partly Baseball/Other Sports Blogs
Lyford's Lyflines (Red Sox & politics)
The Yin Blog: Law Professor Tung Yin (Mostly law, politics & pop culture, some baseball) Eric McErlain's Off Wing Opinion (Mostly sports, lotsa hockey, some politics) Blog Maverick (Dallas Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban's Blog) AlleyOop.com (John Hollinger's Basketball Prospectus Site) Football Outsiders.com The War
First, Blog All The Lawyers
Instapundit (Ping! Ping! Ping! Fastest Blog In The Free World!)
The Volokh Conspiracy - UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh, Family and Friends Howard Bashman's How Appealing - Blog devoted to appellate courts Patterico (LA Prosecutor) Wall Street Journal Law Blog Overlawyered - Tales of Runaway Litigation The Buck Stops Here - Attorney Stuart Buck Pejman NRO Bench Memos Ann Althouse, Wisconsin Law Professor Sports Law Blog All The Right Blogs
RedState
The Federalist The Corner on NRO HotAir: Allahpundit and Ed Morrissey James Taranto's Best of the Web Today (WSJ) Tom Maguire's Just One Minute Ace of Spades HQ Jonathan Last Michael Barone RealClear Politics Go Read Lileks (The Bleat) VodkaPundit Powerline Q and O (Neolibertarians) Wizbang! Dustbury, Oklahoma Libertarian Samizdata (In England, but not in Europe) Signifying Nothing (Chris Lawrence & Brock Sides) Spaceblogger Rand Simberg Funnyblogs, Gossip and Navel-Gazing
Kausfiles (The Sultan of Snark)
Protein Wisdom IMAO Aussie Tim Blair Dave Barry's Blog Josh Reads The Comics Politics
National Review Online (NRO)
The Weekly Standard (Neocon Central) Mark Steyn Online, Everywhere, All The Time ("if we members of the vast right-wing conspiracy don't get back to our daily routine of obsessive Clinton-bashing, then the terrorists will have won.") City Journal (NY From The Right) Other Links
The White House
United States Supreme Court US Senate Roll Call Votes Voice of America News MEMRI.org (Translations From The Arab World) Basketball-Reference.com Pro-Football-Reference.com IMDb (Internet Movie Database) Encyclopedia of Arda (Exhaustive Online Guide To Tolkein's Middle-Earth) Friday Bruce Fix (Excellent Weekly Bruce Springsteen Blog) Backstreets (Official Unofficial Bruce Springsteen Fan Club Site) The Saw Doctors (Irish Rock Band Extraordinaire)
Credits
|
![]()
"It gets late early around here." - Yogi Berra
April 27, 2016
POLITICS: Trump Supporters Already Pre-Spinning November Trump Loss
RS: Trump Supporters Already Pre-Spinning November Trump Loss POLITICS: The Fiorina Pick
NRO: The Fiorina Pick
April 26, 2016
POLITICS: Ten Reasons Moderates Should Vote for Ted Cruz
NRO: Ten Reasons Moderates Should Vote for Ted Cruz
April 25, 2016
POLITICS/FOOTBALL: Donald Trump Hearts Tom Brady; Does Indiana?
RS: Donald Trump Hearts Tom Brady; Does Indiana?
April 20, 2016
HISTORY/POLITICS: Do Not Weep for Andrew Jackson
NRO: Do Not Weep for Andrew Jackson
April 19, 2016
POLITICS: What To Watch For In Tonight's NY Republican Primary
RS: What To Watch For In Tonight's NY Republican Primary POLITICS: When Will Democrats Return Trump's Donations?
NRO: When Will Democrats Return Trump's Donations?
April 8, 2016
POLITICS: After Wisconsin, By The Numbers
RS: After Wisconsin, By The Numbers
April 5, 2016
POLITICS: No, Donald Trump Can't "Burn It Down." Washington Would Go On The Same.
RS: No, Donald Trump Can't "Burn It Down." Washington Would Go On The Same. Of all the arguments made in favor of a vote for Donald Trump to be President of the United States, or at any rate the Republican nominee, probably the most seductive is the argument that Trump will “burn it down”: replace the business-as-usual Washington political establishment with a bull-in-a-china-shop outsider who will do something different. A great many Americans across the political spectrum are deeply frustrated with our system, for many reasons – some of them very good reasons, others understandable ones. Trump speaks to their frustrations, which is a major reason why he has won 37.1% of the popular vote so far in the Republican primaries; so does Bernie Sanders, which is a major reason why Sanders has won 41.1% of the popular vote so far in the Democratic primaries. But even setting aside the many reasons why Trump is highly unlikely to win a general election, anyone who understands the problems with how Washington works also knows that Trump is almost uniquely unsuited to actually change them. Read More » The Sources of Anger There are a lot of different currents of anger running through our politics right now, some of which are contradictory (people on different sides of an issue want opposite things), and some of which are impractical (people are angry at things government is powerless to change, except for the worse). At the roots of the anger is a stagnant economy, which exacerbates every problem that exists in better times. As Jay Cost noted back in December, economic growth or its absence has historically been linked to public trust or distrust of American government, and we’ve been in a period of very weak growth ever since the end of the tech-and-trade boom of the 1990s:
As the Wall Street Journal added in January, 2015 finished as “the tenth straight year that the U.S. economy has grown by less than 3%. Such a long underperformance hasn’t happened since the 1930s.” That’s the backdrop for the economic snake oil of Trump’s trade-war rhetoric and Sanders’ socialism. But anger at the political system has some common political themes as well. People increasingly feel like the government doesn’t listen and doesn’t change – or that when it does change (the biggest changes of the past decade being same-sex marriage and Obamacare) it either does so without consulting the voters (in the case of SSM) or while completely ignoring their loud protests (in the case of Obamacare). And the system rolls on: everybody who goes to DC gets richer, and few go home when they’re done; nobody gets held accountable for disasters like the 2008 credit crisis; political leaders like Bill and Hillary Clinton walk away from things that would get ordinary citizens fired or jailed; people get elected promising Republican voters that they’ll cut government and stop abortion (or even stop financing it), and promising Democratic voters that they’ll punish the banks and close Gitmo, restrain the surveillance state and stop killing people with drones, and somehow none of it happens, yet well-financed interests and liberal legal activists always get what they want, and the budget never stops growing. The system seems impervious to the voters who elect it. Every decent American must be struck now and then with the urge to grab a torch and a pitchfork, burn the whole edifice to the ground, and start over. Lots of “burn it down” voters have flocked to Trump. But Trump is simply the wrong man for the job. The “Deep State” Our Constitutional system of government, as originally designed, wasn’t supposed to be like this. America is a republic, not a pure democracy, so we’re supposed to have checks and balances that operate as sobriety checkpoints that make jarring, far-reaching changes slow at the national level. But this was supposed to be balanced out by keeping most power in the hands of the states and ensuring that the federal government always ultimately answered to “We The People.” Somewhere along the way, step by step, we’ve been losing that – losing the sense that either our state and local governments or our elected representatives in Washington are actually in charge, let alone have the incentive to change things. The courts have erected ever-growing edifices of constitutional law, taking more and more decisions out of the hands of elected officials even on issues never mentioned when the people were asked to add things to the Constitution, leaving massive, unreviewable power in the hands of 5 unelected judges. The power of the purse used to be a great source of influence for the House, which could simply decline to fund things the voters who elected it didn’t like; now, massive amounts of the federal budget – around three-quarters of federal spending, by some estimates – are already committed to entitlements and debt service before Congress even appropriates a penny, and the budget process is rigged so that the only options presented are shutting down the entire government or funding every last horrible thing that the President or a majority of the House or 40 Senators wants. The federal government draws the states into an ever-growing web of funded and unfunded mandates and joint partnerships, which again roll along unless both parties unite to stop them, and for which nobody can be held solely accountable to the voters. Vast economic powers are delegated to the Federal Reserve, which is unelected and only vaguely guided by written rules, and huge powers are devolved on the bureaucracy, including permanent civil servants and a menagerie of agencies not directly accountable to the President – or to anyone else. Writers on the Left and the paleocon and libertarianish Right often refer to this complex – sometimes including the big donors, federal contractors and military brass – as the “Deep State,” a permanent political establishment that reacts slowly, if at all, to the elected branches and is expert at capturing them. If we are going to re-impose any sort of popular control over our government and not simply work within the system as it exists today, the most important element of all is a willingness and ability to tame the “Deep State” by attacking its powers at the roots. Running The Traps This is one area in which a President Donald Trump would be such a conspicuous failure. Yes, sure, Trump is a guy who dislikes letting the Beltway Establishment set rules for him. He’d say whatever he wants, and at least try to do whatever he wants. I have no doubt that Trump, in office, would produce a whirlwind of executive orders and other unilateral acts. I have no doubt as well that he would attempt to negotiate deals he likes with Congress and foreign governments. I’m not so sure we would see his famous “you’re fired” as much as we might like – Trump’s campaign has been awfully hesitant to fire people that Trump hired, unlike the contestants on his TV shows, as that would reflect an admission of error by Trump. But it’s one thing to try to do your own thing without paying attention to the rest of the system; it’s quite another to go after the system’s ability to keep doing its own thing, ignoring you and undermining you at every turn. What in Trump’s background suggests he has either the knowledge of the Deep State system or the personality needed to challenge or dismantle parts of it? The essential characteristic of the whole apparatus is precisely that it doesn’t ask the President’s permission to keep going. You can ignore Supreme Court decisions, but they will keep issuing them, and when you’re gone, they’ll still be on the books and obeyed by lower courts. You can yell at the bureaucracy, but you can’t fire it. This is not a new problem – it’s precisely why ‘outsider’ governors like Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jesse Ventura have gotten steamrolled in office. One is reminded of Harry Truman’s observation about handing over power to Dwight Eisenhower, our last President who had never been an elected official: “Poor Ike. It won’t be a bit like the Army. He’ll sit here and he’ll say, ‘Do this, do that,’ and nothing will happen.” Eisenhower, as befit his vast military and diplomatic experience, proved a highly skilled and savvy Commander-in-Chief and a determined, hands-on enforcer of the laws, but he never even attempted to reverse the trends of how DC had swollen under the New Deal. And his Supreme Court appointments would go on to massively expand the power of the judiciary. Ike ran the government very, very well – but he never even tried to tame it. Trump has no intention – he has made this clear – of altering entitlements, so right off the bat, most of the budget is off the table, and his obvious ignorance of the budget process means he would never be able to get far enough into the weeds to actually reform how the system works. He has proposed no reforms that would actually change anything about the bureaucracy or the judiciary or even the Pentagon, nor given any indication of having studied the question. As I noted back in November, in arguing for Bobby Jindal:
Would Trump burn down the system? I’m not even sure he’d know where to set the matches. Even working within the system, if you haven’t done the homework to understand how the Deep State puts one over on its transient elected masters, you stand little chance of piercing its smoke screens. I’ve made a similar point before about why Trump would ultimately be a bonanza for the GOP’s consultant class – his nomination would actually encourage more of the kinds of candidates most likely to lavish resources on consultants and depend on them, rather than knowing enough (as Ted Cruz does) to impose some supervision and discipline on them and require them to produce results. Trump’s whole background in real estate development is that of a guy who plays by the rules and within system (hence, his many donations to liberal politicians), not one who tries to change the game, as this shrewd review of his book “Art of the Deal” explains:
Read the whole thing; there’s a lot more where that came from, and a lot to think about even in a review that is broadly sympathetic to Trump’s book. Think about it: when has Trump shown any interest in changing the rules for anything? When has he shown he even knows or cares what the rules are? As Leon noted yesterday, Trump keeps getting schooled by Ted Cruz just on how to understand and operate within the rules of the Republican delegate system – unsurprisingly, since Cruz is a brilliant Constitutional lawyer whose whole life has been dedicated to rules, but Trump’s failure to plan ahead for how to beat the party establishment at its own game bodes very poorly for his ability to do the same to the Deep State. And of course, the fact that Trump has no fixed political principles means he is bound to take the paths of least resistance to any end he desires – why dig in for a long, bloody fight to reform how the rules work, when someone with a vested interest in the rules is willing to offer you a short term reward? In 1876, Republicans took a bargain that gave Rutherford B. Hayes a single term in the White House, and gave Democrats the end of Reconstruction and effective control of the South for the next 75 years. That’s the kind of deal the “GOPe” has been making ever since, and yet it’s exactly the kind of deal you and I know Trump would take and declare a “win” because he’s always more interested in being a winner than in the long game. If we stand any chance of making real change in how the country works over the next four years, we won’t get it from Trump (any more than we would from Hillary Clinton, who is practically the living embodiment of the Beltway Establishment). Fortunately, there happens to be one guy left in this race who actually cares very deeply about the rules of the game and how to change them: Ted Cruz. Maybe Cruz won’t succeed either in burning the whole system down, and maybe he shouldn’t try to bite off such an ambitious goal, but at least he will try and has a track record of being precisely the kind of person who will hold out to get some real results. « Close It
April 4, 2016
LAW/POLITICS: BREAKING: SCOTUS Rejects "One Man One Vote" Challenge
|