Interesting article in Reason Magazine arguing that the big Supreme Court takings case this term, as well as another rather flimsy-sounding lawsuit against the Bengals could spell real trouble for future efforts to soak the taxpayers for publicly-funded stadiums (via Bashman). Personally, I’ve long thought that – as a condition of exemption from the antitrust laws – it would be perfectly legitimate for the federal government to intervene by statute to prevent big-time pro sports teams from extorting public money as a condition of not relocating. While that would go against my usual disinclination to over-regulate business and interfere in state and local government, a statutory solution could be necessary to protect state and local taxpayers from the undue leverage created by the ability of sports teams to relocate and not be replaced.
3 thoughts on “BASEBALL/ Stadium Shuffle”
Comments are closed.
if you know something about anti-trust law you should post a column on what exactly the anti-trust exception is and how it benefits MLB, and why MLB is afraid to have the exemption revoked.
There is a very good short column — “How Does Antitrust Affect MLB” — available at https://www.cbaforfans.com/antitrust.html
Lunchtime Links
I made the mistake of staying up to watch the Suns and the Mavs last night. It’s amazing how poorly…